Watch The Santa Clause 3: The Escape Clause Youtube

A screenshot from McMakistein’s YouTube video about recreating Overwatch character Doomfist. Chloe Spencer is the summer intern for Kotaku and recently graduated. Below we have livestreams on everything from YouTube to Facebook to virtual reality. Some of the streams even include a 360 degree feature that lets you swivel your. The Watcher Files - Exposing aliens, reptilians, humans who are possessed and controlled by them, government black operations, aliens, ufos, the secret government and. Get the latest news on celebrity scandals, engagements, and divorces! Check out our breaking stories on Hollywood?s hottest stars!

Watch The Santa Clause 3: The Escape Clause Youtube

Somehow, This Has Gotten Even More Ludicrous. Welcome to Ney. Watch, a series in which we catch up with the daily, often contradictory updates on the hottest story of the summer. It seemed like Barcelona’s official confirmation that Neymar was on his way out of the club would usher in a calmer, final stage of the transfer saga that had previously confounded at every turn. Watch Splitting Heirs Mediafire. Well, that was wrong.

We are in full on Nick Young Face territory now. Earlier today, lawyers representing Neymar and Paris Saint- Germain went to La Liga headquarters to deposit the €2. Watch Small Soldiers Online Iflix on this page. Neymar’s release clause and allow him to sign with PSG. On its face, this is all exactly in line with the somewhat bizarre protocols mandated by Spain’s release- clause laws.

Pay the money, take the medical, sign the contract, and all of this could finally be done. As is typical in this soap opera, things did not go so smoothly. Right as Neymar’s and PSG’s lawyers went to hand the check over to the league official in charge of this stuff, the official—probably sporting something between a sneer and a shit- eating grin—went all, Hm, actually no, we’re not taking your money, and sent the lawyers on their way.

Watch The Santa Clause 3: The Escape Clause Youtube

Yes, the league rejected the ostensibly entirely legal and contractually- stipulated payment of Neymar’s release clause, seemingly for no good reason. This is absolutely insane and insanely petty. La Liga’s move, though, wasn’t entirely surprising. Just yesterday Javier Tebas, the head of the Spanish league system, gave an interview stating that the league would not accept the payment of Neymar’s release clause. This went hand in hand with his and Barcelona’s earlier threats to report PSG to UEFA immediately upon payment of the buyout clause under the theory that paying that enormous sum would put PSG in violation of UEFA’s Financial Fair Play regulations.

On Wednesday, Facebook announced the rollout of Watch, what it is calling “a new platform for shows on Facebook.” It’s yet another foray by the social media. Singer Dion DiMucci, best known for 60s hits like Runaround Sue and The Wanderer, is taking the parent company of Fallout 4 developer Bethesda to court over the use.

Watch The Santa Clause 3: The Escape Clause Youtube

In the interview, Tebas explained what he sees as the fundamental problem with the potential Neymar transfer, and why his office planned to do everything possible to prevent it from going through: The problem is that Neymar is being taken by a financially- doped team that competes with an advantage. The problem is the state- backed clubs, they need to be stopped. Putting aside the very real potential dangers of a state- backed club circumventing the rules all other clubs have to abide with shady under- the- table deals using nominally unrelated entities to pay for things like transfer fees or salaries or the like, neither Tebas nor Barcelona have any jurisdiction here. UEFA is the body that investigates FFP compliance issues, not any domestic league and not any individual club itself. There’s no such thing as “filing a FFP complaint” to UEFA, because UEFA already checks every transfer and every club’s finances. Spanish law mandates every contract have a release clause, and there’s no exception that allows them to be rejected if the current employer has a problem with the potential new employer’s business practices.

It’s all nothing but baseless posturing. In addition, not only does paying a release clause itself—even one as enormous as Neymar’s—not automatically constitute a FFP violation (PSG could potentially sell about four players and make up the vast majority if not the entirety of the release clause amount), but the transfer stage is not even where these things are adjudicated. Not even UEFA can prevent a valid transaction in the middle of a transfer window just because it might run afoul of FFP, and La Liga or Barcelona definitely can’t do so. And yet that appears to be exactly what La Liga just did by refusing to accept the release clause payment that Neymar’s and PSG’s lawyers brought them today. It is simply outrageous. While La Liga’s rejection this morning seems on its face like a bunch of legally unsupportable bullshit, it is possible that the league had a valid technical justification for turning the sum down.

From the Guardian: La Liga is understood to have also explained that it is unclear on the origins of the money and that under its regulations only Spanish clubs have the guaranteed right to buy out a contract. The league has repeatedly accepted buyout clause deposits from foreign clubs. It would not be able to reject the money if Neymar himself turned up to pay it.

Now this could make some sense. One of the biggest reasons why Neymar’s exit from Barcelona always looked at best exceedingly difficult and at worst nearly impossible is because of the specifics of release clauses in Spain. They must be paid in cash, upfront, in total, and by the player himself.

This means PSG would need to scrounge up all of €2. Neymar’s bank account in a way that doesn’t look suspicious to the FFP investigators who will look into it, and on top of that pay what has been reported to be about €7.

Neymar. In other words, even for an infinitely rich club like PSG, this transfer stood to be an extremely costly and legally confusing operation. Because Barcelona were stridently against selling Neymar and because the league didn’t want to lose one of the biggest stars in all of sports to some oil- rich upstart in a league nobody cares about, it makes some sense that both of them would force PSG to jump through each and every hoop without a single slip- up during the process of taking Neymar away. Thus, if PSG really were trying to circumvent the all the taxes and potential FFP violations that might arise from following the exact letter of the release clause law, and came to La Liga’s office today with lawyers “representing” both Neymar and PSG but who in reality had come to deposit a check written by PSG proper, then you could see how the league could rightfully reject the payment. Doing so is petty, counterproductive, and makes both the league and Barcelona look terrible, but it is justifiable. The latest reports say Neymar’s and PSG’s people will make another attempt to pay the clause today, this time by depositing the money directly with Barcelona, which is apparently procedurally acceptable. We’ll have to wait and see whether this time the money will come directly from Neymar, or if Barcelona will just accept it anyway.

It’s not exactly clear that the league’s stunt today works in Barça’s favor, as it would be in their best interest for all this to be done with as soon as possible so they can go about signing reinforcements with the money before it’s too late.) No matter what, this transfer is set to be dumb and ridiculous and captivating right to the very end.[Guardian].

Morally Indefensible" Fallout 4 Commercial Leads To Lawsuit. Singer Dion Di. Mucci, best known for 6. Runaround Sue and The Wanderer, is taking the parent company of Fallout 4 developer Bethesda to court over the use of one of his songs in a commercial, which he found “repugnant”. The commercial in question is this one, which features Di. Mucci’s The Wanderer playing over the top of cinematic Fallout sequences. While Di. Mucci signed a general agreement with Universal for his song to be used in situations like this, he claims in a filing made with a California court earlier this month that the contract also included the clause that the track couldn’t be played “without separately bargaining with” Di. Mucci and gaining his personal approval.

The singer claims this personal approval was never sought, and that the commercial features “repugnant and morally indefensible images” that he would never have agreed to have his song represent. As a direct and proximate of Defendant’s actions, Plaintiff has been damaged. In addition to the loss of the fee which Plaintiff had the right to charge for the use of his performance in commercial advertisements, he lost his right to refuse consent. Defendant’s Commercials were objectionable because they featured repeated homicides in a dark, dystopian landscape, where violence is glorified as sport.

The killings and physical violence were not to protect innocent life, but instead were repugnant and morally indefensible images designed to appeal to young consumers. In The Wanderer, Dion gives life to the story of a sad young man who wanders from town to town, not having found himself or the capacity for an enduring relationship. The song describes isolation during coming of age. Without Plaintiff’s consent, Defendants dubbed The Wanderer into commercials in which the protagonist, a wanderer, roams from one location to the next, armed and hunting for victims to slaughter. Defendant’s Commercials have no redeeming value, they simply entice young people to buy a videogame by glorifying homicide, making the infliction of harm appear appealing, if not also satisfying. While he found the commercials as they were made to “have no redeeming value”, Di. Mucci says that had he been involved in negotiations, he would have tried to steer the clip in a different direction.

Had Defendant performed its obligations and bargained with Plaintiff prior to the first use, Plaintiff could have used his right to refuse consent to persuade Defendant to change the scripts so that, for instance, they instead told the story of a postapocalyptic struggle for survival without craven violence. Alternately, he could have priced into his fee adequate compensation to safeguard himself against the potential loss of goodwill from being associated with the immoral images in Defendant’s scripts. As a result, Di. Mucci is suing Bethesda’s parent company Zenimax for damages, while claiming that because the commercials are still available on You.

Tube, “their continued presence is an ongoing irreparable injury”. Di. Mucci is seeking $1 million in damages from the case, along with legal costs. We’ve contacted Bethesda for comment.